Projects · 04 · HDR
Dallas, TX · 2018–2019
04 · Visual communicationHDR, Inc.Dallas, TX2018–2019

Making the engineering legible

Nearly two years on HDR's visual communication team in Dallas, turning transportation and infrastructure proposals into fact sheets, maps, and renders that engineers, agencies, and the public could read at a glance.

Trinity Lakes Station, Fort Worth. Presentation render of a proposed platform, modeled from plan drawings and billed as part of the pursuit team's work.Fig. 1

A pursuit is won in a review room, in minutes. The visual that makes the engineering legible is the one the panel remembers.

Role
Visual Communication Designer
For
HDR pursuit teams; DART, TxDOT, NDOT, ODOT, and other agencies
Tools
Illustrator, Photoshop, SketchUp, Blender
Years
2018 to 2019, Dallas office

Why this work mattered

Proposals compete on the page before they compete on the numbers. The visuals carried the argument.

Context

HDR pursues public-sector transportation work: rail corridors, highway reconstructions, streetcar systems, bridges, and water projects. Each pursuit means a proposal, an interview, and a room of reviewers who have to understand a complex scheme quickly. Working with engineers, planners, and marketing specialists, I made the graphics those rooms saw: site-specific maps, infographics, sectional illustrations, and 3D renders that showed the project and made HDR's technical case visible.

The work supported road, bridge, water, and engineering departments and visual communication teams across the company, and went into proposals for DART, TxDOT, NDOT, ODOT, and others. Some of those proposals won multi-million-dollar projects.

3kinds of deliverable: fact sheets, maps and infographics, section models and renders
5DART information sheets shown here, each a two-page spread
4+state and regional agencies in the proposals: DART, TxDOT, NDOT, ODOT
2years in the Dallas office, 2018 to 2019

DART fact sheets

Public outreach, stakeholder briefings, and grant applications, on two pages each.

Five sheets

Dallas Area Rapid Transit needed documents that a resident, a council member, and a federal reviewer could all read: what the project is, what it costs, when it opens, what it changes. I structured the engineering and planning data into a fixed layout, built the icons, maps, and charts, and kept every sheet inside both HDR's and DART's brand standards, then prepared print-ready files for distribution.

DART D2 Subway fact sheet, page one: at-a-glance figures, project timeline, rail operations map, and proposed operating plan.
DART D2 Subway fact sheet, page two: alignment and station highlights map from Victory Station to Deep Ellum.
D2 Subway. Second downtown alignment, Victory Station to Deep Ellum: cost, timeline, and station highlights.Fig. 2
DART Cotton Belt Regional Rail Corridor fact sheet, page one: corridor figures, ridership projections, timeline, and service characteristics.
DART Cotton Belt fact sheet, page two: corridor overview map and station highlights from DFW Airport to Shiloh Road.
Cotton Belt Regional Rail Corridor. DFW Airport to Shiloh Road: ridership, timeline, and the station-by-station map.Fig. 3
DART Platform Extensions fact sheet, page one: budget and station counts, timeline, and peak-hour capacity increase.
DART Platform Extensions fact sheet, page two: platform location map across the Red and Blue lines.
Platform Extensions. Red and Blue lines: 28 stations, capacity up to 33% higher at peak, and where each platform sits.Fig. 4
Dallas Streetcar Central Link fact sheet, page one: project figures, description, and system timeline.
Dallas Streetcar Central Link fact sheet, page two: Central Link alternatives map through downtown.
Dallas Streetcar Central Link. Convention Center to Uptown and Klyde Warren Park: the alternatives, mapped.Fig. 5
Streetcar master plan information sheet, page one: purposes of streetcar, corridor characteristics, and service characteristics.
Streetcar master plan information sheet, page two: typical costs, vehicles, and the implementation process.
Streetcar master plan. The system explained: purpose, corridors, vehicles, costs, and how a line gets built.Fig. 6

What the sheets had to do

Design and production
  1. Hold complex data in a readable layout.Budgets, ridership, timelines, and alignments in one fixed structure across the series.
  2. Lead the eye to the numbers that matter.A clear hierarchy from at-a-glance figures to detail.
  3. Draw the graphics, not stock them.Custom icons, maps, and charts per project.
  4. Stay inside two brands at once.HDR's standards and DART's, on every sheet.
  5. Ship print-ready.Files prepared for client distribution.

Who they reached

Collaboration and impact
  1. Engineers, planners, and marketers refined content and visuals together.
  2. Residents and stakeholders got the project in plain terms for community engagement.
  3. Federal reviewers saw the same material in grant applications.
  4. Rail expansions, subway alignments, streetcar systems, and platform extensions all went through the same format.

Maps and infographics

Project areas, corridors, and competitive comparisons for proposals and interview presentations.

Proposal graphics

How they were made

Design and development

Maps ranged from a simple overview to a dense regional analysis. I integrated GIS data, aerial imagery, and client-provided information in Illustrator and Photoshop, layered the visuals so routes, stations, and development zones read clearly, and built consistent iconography, legends, and color systems so a reader could move between maps without relearning them. Every map matched HDR's brand standards and the proposal templates it lived in.

What they did for the pursuit

Strategic use
  1. Made the differentiators visible.Key benefits and technical approaches, drawn rather than described.
  2. Compared the alternatives.Comparative maps that showed where competing solutions fell short.
  3. Translated for non-technical readers.Infrastructure and planning concepts for decision-makers and review panels.
NorthernSegmentSouthernSegment
FutureInterchangePlayaCemeteryMajor Utility
Amarillo. Corridor and study-area maps built from GIS data and aerial imagery.Fig. 7
IIIBOP BELT LINE RD - IH635IH 635 - EOP IH35EPHASESCOPPELLBELT LINE RDSANDY LAKE RDBELT LINE RD MACARTHUR BLVDLUNA RDROYAL LN CHALLENGESMATERIAL TRACKINGSMOOTHING ROLLERCOASTER AREASCONSTRUCTIONINGRESS/EGRESS POINTSNIGHTTIME OPERATIONSPOSITIVE DRAINAGEPRE-WIDENINGTRAFFIC FLOW SOIL SULFATE TESTINGUTILITY COORDINATIONIII
President George Bush Turnpike. Two-phase corridor map from BOP Belt Line Road to IH-635 and IH-635 to the east project limit, built alongside a construction-challenges legend for the review team.Fig. 8

Section models and renders

Spatial, structural, and environmental intent, modeled from engineering drawings.

2D and 3D

When a plan view could not carry the idea, I built it. SketchUp for accurate spatial modeling from the engineers' and architects' drawings, Blender for lighting and composition, Photoshop and Illustrator for post-production. Some renders were realistic, some deliberately conceptual, depending on the audience and how far along the project was.

US 90 cross-sections, sheet one: existing and proposed roadway sections with lane widths and vehicles.
US 90, sheet 1Fig. 9
US 90 cross-sections, sheet two.
US 90, sheet 2Fig. 10
US 90 cross-sections, sheet three.
US 90, sheet 3Fig. 11

Figures 8 to 10: existing and proposed sections along US 90 for TxDOT, drawn as 3D section models so lane configuration, medians, and right of way read at a glance.

I-10 San Antonio: existing and proposed cross-sections, sheet one.
I-10, San Antonio. Existing above, proposed below.Fig. 12
I-10 San Antonio: existing and proposed cross-sections, sheet two.
I-10, San Antonio. Second sheet of sections.Fig. 13
Conceptual render of a future highway with dedicated vehicle-to-infrastructure lanes, drone launch pads, machine-readable signs, and an inductive charging lane, with a city skyline behind.
A road that talks to its vehicles. Conceptual render exploring dedicated infrastructure lanes, drone pads, LiDAR-readable signage, and dynamic charging, built as exploratory work rather than for a specific pursuit.Fig. 14
DDI Roadway Practice Animation. A double-diamond interchange sequence built as an internal training exercise for HDR's strategic communications team, not tied to a specific pursuit.Fig. 15

What it did

Where the visuals landed, and what they helped win.

Outcome

In the room

Reception

The visuals went into proposals and interview presentations, and helped pursuit teams communicate scale, function, and design intent to decision-makers and review panels.

  • Proposals won. Several of the proposals this work supported went on to win funded, multi-million-dollar client projects.
  • Clearer proposals. Visual strength and clarity of HDR's client proposals and interview presentations, with the differentiators drawn rather than described.
  • Reused across teams. Fact sheets, maps, and renders served road, bridge, water, and engineering departments, and visual communication teams company-wide.
Selim Aziz Design (SAD) · Cincinnati, OHSet in Poppins · © 2026 Selim Aziz
VER 1.0
Made with